元上都、大都与中都规划设计之比例、尺度与数术内涵探析(上)
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王南,故宫博物院故宫学研究所馆员,博士,主要从事中国建筑历史与理论、故宫学研究。

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Investigating the Proportions, Scales, and Numerological Significances inthe Plans of Shangdu, Dadu, and Zhongdu of Yuan Dynasty: Part 1
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    结合考古实测数据、文献记载和几何作图分析,探讨元上都、大都与中都三座都城规划设计的构图比例、尺度规模及其背后所蕴含的数术内涵。在前人研究基础上,发现并指出:元代三都在规划设计上皆存在着清晰的构图比例,集中体现在每座都城的外城、皇城与宫城的平面形状与比例关系上;三座都城的外城面积与宫城(有时包括皇城)面积皆存在整数倍关系,而大都与中都的宫城面积与宫中主体建筑(前朝或后寝的正殿)所占据矩形地块的面积也存在整数倍关系——若套用《周礼·考工记》中“室中度以几,堂上度以筵,宫中度以寻,野度以步,涂度以轨”或者《营造法式》中“凡构屋之制,皆以材为祖”等古代术语,可将上述规律归纳为“都度以宫”“宫度以正殿”或者“凡营都之制,皆以宫为祖”“凡营宫之制,皆以正殿为祖”。此外,上述比例关系中所涉及的数字,以及各都城三重城垣、宫中正殿(甚至包括街区、街道等)的尺度换算成元代尺、步、丈、里、亩等数值,皆呈现出丰富而博大的中国传统数术内涵,尤其表现为对《周易》思想以及中国古代天文、律历的象征,这也恰恰与历史文献中所记上都、大都的主要规划者刘秉忠“于书无所不读,尤邃于《易》及邵氏《经世书》,至于天文、地理、律历、三式六壬遁甲之属,无不精通”的知识结构与思想体系高度契合。

    Abstract:

    This paper aims to investigate the geometricproportions, scales, and numerological connotationsembedded within the plans of the capitals of Yuandynasty: Shangdu, Dadu, and Zhongdu. Building uponprevious research, this paper proposes that all threecapitals exhibit distinct geometric proportions in theirlayout plans, primarily manifested in the shape andproportional relationships between the outer city, imperialcity, and palace city within each capital. Additionally,it observes integer multiple relationships between thearea of outer city and palace city (sometimes includingthe imperial city) in each capital. Furthermore, in Daduand Zhongdu, the area of palace cities and rectangularplots occupied by their main halls also displayinteger multiples. Drawing upon ancient architecturalterminologies found in texts such as Zhouli Kaogongji,which describes measurement systems, and YingzaoFashi, which provides architectural principles, thepaper generalized these principles to “inside a capital,everything is measured according to the size of a palace”,“inside a palace everything is measured according to thesize of the main hall”, or “all principles of constructingcapitals are based on the palace.” Moreover, the numericalvalues involved in the aforementioned ratios and scales ofthe three-loop city layout and the main palace (includingblocks, streets, etc.) in each capital, when convertedinto measurement units such as chi, bu, zhang, li, andmu used during Yuan dynasty, carry significant Chinese traditional numerological connotations. These numberssymbolize the ideologies of Yijing (Book of Changes),ancient Chinese astronomy, and the legal calendar,aligning with the knowledge structure and ideologicalsystem attributed to Liu Bingzhong, the main planner ofShangdu and Dadu, who was reputed for his extensiveknowledge in areas such as Yijing and Shao’s JingshiShu, astronomy, geography, the legal calendar, and theThree Methods and Six Ren. This paper sheds light on theprofound connections between the geometric proportions,numerical values, and ideological influences found withinthe layout plans of Yuan’s capitals, providing referencesof the complex intellectual framework and ideologicalsystems of Liu Bingzhong, the principal planner ofShangdu and Dadu.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王南.元上都、大都与中都规划设计之比例、尺度与数术内涵探析(上)[J].建筑史学刊,2023,(3):38-52.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:2023-05-17
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-01-19